Revealed: the Socialist
International, world government and international finance
20 May 2014
The Socialist International
is a London-based organisation set up by the
Fabian Society and the Labour Party for the
purpose of establishing a world government controlled by international
Already in the late 1800s,
the Fabian Society (FS) – which had close links to the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and other leading bankers
and industrialists – set out to achieve control over Britain’s
working and middle classes as a means to impose state control over
resources, industry and finance.
The key organisations
through which the FS aimed to achieve this objective were: the London
School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), the Independent Labour
Party (ILP), the Trades Union Congress (TUC) and the Labour Representation
Committee (LRC), later renamed The Labour Party.
The FS and its Labour front came very close to achieving their
objective in the early 1940s when – as Britain’s second-largest
party – Labour was invited by the ruling
Conservatives to join a coalition government for the duration of the war.
As part of the government, Labour did its best to
impose a regime of partial nationalisation, centralised control and planned production.
After winning the 1945
general elections, Labour was able to carry over
the war-time system of State control into peace.
Socialist experiment quickly fell out of favour
with the British people, resulting in a sound defeat in the following
However, while losing power
at home, Labour was able to take a leading role
on the international scene.
As most of Europe’s Socialist
parties had been closed down by the German authorities during the war,
Socialist ringleaders fled to London where they were harboured
by the Labour Party. After the war, Labour was involved in reconstructing Socialist parties
all over Europe, particularly in West Germany which at the time was under
British and American occupation.
In this way, Labour became de
facto leader of International Socialism, a position it exploited to the
full to achieve its goal of taking worldwide control of the Socialist
socialist-corporate drive for world government
A long-cherished aim of the
Fabian Society and the Labour Party was world
government, an aim they shared with their financial supporters and promoted
through writings like Leonard Woolf’s International Government (1916) as
well as through organisations like the League of
Nations and the United Nations.
The Rockefellers, in
particular, had spent millions of dollars financing Fabian projects like
the London School of Economics (LSE) and the League of Nations, and played
a central role in founding and financing the League’s successor, the
The key organisations
involved in the creation of the United Nations were: (1) the Special Subcommittee on International Organisation, a subcommittee of the US Advisory
Committee on Postwar Policy, (2) the War and Peace Studies (WPS) group and
(3) the Informal Agenda Group (IAG). All three were staffed with members of
the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – which
dominated the US State Department – and over 40 CFR operatives,
including Nelson Rockefeller and Rockefeller lawyer McCloy
(see below), were at the 1945 San Francisco Conference which founded the
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has officially
acknowledged that the Rockefeller family has provided “immense
support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the
years” (UN Department of Public Information, SG/SM/14498, 10 Sept 2012).
UN’s links to Socialism were absolutely clear from inception, with
the appointment of leading Belgian Socialist Paul-Henri Spaak
as President, of Norwegian Labour Party leader Trygve Lie as Secretary-General, of Russian Socialist
(Communist) Arkady Sobolev
as Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs, etc.
The UN and the Socialist International
Labour Party’s National Executive Committee
had already started to study the problem of organising
an international association of Labour and
Socialist parties during the war. In 1945, while the UN was being set up in
America, a Socialist Conference of the United Nations was held in London,
where a committee was appointed to set up a temporary London-based bureau
to organise international Socialist conferences.
May 1946, Labour convened a conference of
Socialist parties in Clacton-on-Sea where the
Socialist Information and Liaison Office (SILO) was set up for the above
purpose. SILO was housed in the Labour
Party’s headquarters and financed by it.
November 1947 the Antwerp conference set up the Committee of the
International Socialist Conference (COMISCO) with headquarters in London,
to function between conferences. A sub-committee of COMISCO was set up in
the following year to function in the intervals between COMISCO meetings,
while SILO was renamed “The Secretariat of the International
Phillips, General Secretary of the Labour Party
and long-time Fabian Socialist, was elected chairman of COMISCO which,
again, shows that this was a Fabian-Labour
at a London conference in March 1951, COMISCO proposed that the
International Socialist Conference at the next meeting should change its
name to “The Socialist International,” COMISCO to “The
Council of the Socialist International” and the COMISCO sub-committee
to “The Bureau of the Socialist International”.
was approved at the Frankfurt-on-Main conference of July 1951 and the
Socialist International was constituted as an organisation
consisting of a Bureau, a Council, a Congress and a Secretariat, for the
purpose of co-ordinating the policies and
activities of all Labour and Socialist parties in
inception, the SI affirmed its unflinching support for the United Nations.
Its very first declaration, “Aims and Tasks of Democratic
Socialism” (1951) stated:
socialism regards the establishment of the United Nations as an important
step towards an international community; it demands the strict
implementation of the principles of its Charter”.
was reiterated in subsequent declarations such as that of the 1962 Oslo
ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing
less than world government. As a step towards it, they seek to strengthen
the United Nations so that it may become more and more effective …
Membership of the United Nations must be made universal”.
directing force behind the SI, of course, was the Fabian Society operating
through its Labour Party front whose position was
made very clear in its election manifestos:
us world government is the ultimate objective and the United Nations the
chosen instrument” (Labour Party manifesto,
over six million members, Labour was the largest
Socialist party outside Communist Russia and China. In addition, it
controlled the Socialist parties of key European countries like Germany and
France, whose leaders had fallen under Labour
influence during their exile in London.
General Secretary Morgan Phillips as chairman and Guy Mollet
(General Secretary of the French Socialist Party) and Erich Ollenhauer (Chairman of the German Social Democratic
Party) as vice-presidents, Labour was in a
position to dominate the International and steer it in the desired
direction of world government.
and the International’s declared intention of making the UN their
chosen instrument of world government suggests that they really represented
the banking and industrial interests who had set up the UN.
among these were the Rockefellers and associates who, either directly or
indirectly (through the Council on Foreign Relations, the State Department,
etc.) were instrumental in drafting the blueprint for the UN, for
conducting the conferences that organised the UN,
for writing the Charter that established the UN and for financing both the
conferences and the UN itself. Even the land on which the UN’s New
York headquarters was built was provided by the Rockefellers and they have
been involved in the UN project ever since.
Socialism and international finance: how Labour
governments have been bankrolled by the Rockefellers and associates through
the US State and Treasury Departments and the International Monetary Fund
US President F D Roosevelt
was a close collaborator of the Rockefellers and represented the interests
of their Council on Foreign Relations (Dall, p.
192). In 1939 he allowed the CFR, with funds from the Rockefeller
Foundation, to do research and make recommendations to the US State
Department on (1) Security and Armaments Problems, (2) Economic and
Financial Problems, (3) Political Problems and (4) Territorial Problems.
CFR members were involved in all State Department policies ever since
(Smoot, p. 8).
In 1946, left-wing US
President Truman (Roosevelt’s running mate) arranged the
Anglo-American Loan in the amount of $4.33 billion, which benefited Labour’s Attlee Government.
In 1947, Labour’s
Attlee Government drew over $2.75 billion from US funds in addition to
one-quarter billion dollars from the Rockefeller-controlled IMF (created at
the 1944 UN Monetary and Financial Conference).
In 1969, Labour’s
Wilson Government raised $4 billion, 1 billion of which came from the IMF.
In 1976, Labour’s
floundering Callaghan Government asked the IMF for a humiliating bailout of $4 billion (£2.3 billion) (Stone-Lee, 2005)
and put Britain’s economy under IMF supervision, etc.
All the above were arranged
by Fabian Chancellors under Fabian Prime Ministers.
Marshall Plan: how the Rockefellers bankrolled
Recovery Programme (ERP) a.k.a. Marshall Plan was
initiated in 1948 by CFR members Will Clayton and George F. Kennan based on David Rockefeller’s CFR report
“Reconstruction in Western Europe”.
According to US Government
sources, the Marshall Plan “provided
markets for American goods and created reliable trading partners”.
Unfortunately, the Marshall
Plan also financed European Socialism. The bulk of the $13 billion Marshall
Aid went to:
Britain was run by the Fabian
Socialist Labour Party; France was run by a
coalition government of Communists, Socialists and “Christian
Democrats”; Germany was run by Fabian Socialist Ernest Bevin and
Americans like US High Commissioner John J McCloy,
a Rockefeller front man (a partner at the Rockefeller-associated New York
law firm Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy);
Italy was run by Alcide de Gasperi,
a former member of the Social Christian movement.
If to the four main Marshall
Aid recipients we add minor ones like Belgium (Socialist Party), Denmark
(Social Democrat), Luxembourg (Christian Social, Socialist Workers,
Democrat), Norway (Labour Party) and Sweden
(Social Democrat), we can clearly see that most of Marshall Plan money
– over 76 per cent – went to Socialist and associated left-wing
governments, thereby benefiting International Socialism.
No surprise then, that Labour and its collaborators among European parties
were instrumental in mobilising Socialist support
for the Marshall Plan.
When some Socialist parties
correctly saw the Plan as a tool by which US money interests sought to
influence or control Europe’s economies and expressed opposition to
it, Labour convened a separate conference –
held on 22 and 23 March 1948 – consisting of pro-Marshall Plan
parties, thereby ensuring “unanimous” support for the Plan.
Socialist International and the European Union
The idea of a United States
of Europe had been a Liberal Capitalist scheme from the time of Richard
Cobden, a textile manufacturer with railway interests in America, and was
soon adopted by Socialists of all shades from Friedrich Engels
to Vladimir Lenin to Liberal (and later Labourite)
This was part of a larger
plan by Anglo-American interests to unite the British Empire with America
and Western Europe. Federal Union was one of the organisations
set up for this purpose in 1938 by Percival Brundage
– a partner at the Anglo-American consultancy practice Price
Waterhouse & Co. and later budget director to President Eisenhower (a
Rockefeller collaborator) – and enjoyed the support of prominent
Fabian Socialists like Barbara Wootton and
William Beveridge (another Rockefeller
After the Second World War,
the idea was resuscitated by the same Anglo-American Liberal Capitalists
and their Socialist collaborators and made a precondition of Marshall Aid.
Already on 27 May 1947,
William Clayton, US Department of State (USDS) Deputy-Secretary for
Economic Affairs, had announced the suggestion of USDS economics
“experts” for the creation of a European Economic Federation.
Next day, Clayton, the
director of Marshall’s Policy Planning Staff George Kennan and other USDS division heads held a meeting
with Secretary of State George Marshall at which they decided that
Europe’s economic borders should be removed (Agnew & Entrikin, p. 129).
On 5 June 1947, Marshall
delivered a speech at Rockefeller-controlled Harvard University in which he
spoke of Europe’s alleged requirements for food and other products
from America for the following few years and warned of “the
consequences to the economy of the United States” if these
requirements were not met.
In reality, Europe was in no
need of American food. Marshall himself in his speech stated that European
farmers produced an ample supply of food and, as it turned out, Russia, who
refused American aid, managed quite well.
The real problem was that
Europe’s new Socialist economies were floundering due to state
control, management and planning, especially in Socialist-controlled towns
and cities which is why, by the First Conference of the Socialist
International, European Socialists came to backtrack on total state
planning, declaring that “Socialist planning … is compatible
with the existence of private ownership in important fields, for instance
in agriculture, handicraft, retail trade and small and middle-sized
The impact of Socialist state
control on the economy was becoming particularly clear in Fabian-Labour-controlled Britain. Therefore, Attlee’s
Fabian Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin rushed to welcome Marshall’s
speech and chaired the Conference for European Economic Co-operation on 13
July 1947 which established the Committee for European Economic
Co-operation (CEEC), later called Organisation
for European Economic Co-operation (OEEC).
At this stage, the plan had
not yet been officially approved. It was only on 3 April 1948, after much
propaganda by leftist business and labour
internationalists (Agnew & Entrikin, p. 13),
that the US Congress finally passed the Economic Cooperation Act, approving
The Preamble to the Act
stated very clearly:
“It is further declared
to be the policy of the people of the United States to encourage the
unification of Europe” (US Congress, Economic Cooperation Act, 3
The very purpose of the OEEC
was to allocate among West European countries the funds provided by the
Marshall Plan, which shows that Marshall Aid was inextricably linked with
European unification through economic integration.
The following year, Bevin claimed that:
is a strong body of public feeling in the United States which expects
Europe, with or without the United Kingdom, to get together politically and
economically, as a price for the continuance of United States aid. This
school of thought has in particular many adherents in the Economic
Co-operation Administration … we should be attacked in the United
States if we could be shown to be preventing European unification” (CAB/129/37/4, “Council of Europe,”
Memorandum by Bevin, 24 October 1949).
There was, of course, no need
for anyone to attack Bevin for preventing European unification. He himself had earlier called for a Western
European Union backed by “American power and wealth” (see
National Archives, CAB/129/32, Memorandum by Bevin, 7 Jan. 1949,
CAB/129/37, Memorandum by Bevin, 18 Oct. 1949, etc.).
Moreover, official Labour Party statements tell us exactly what kind of
European Union Bevin and the Labour Party wanted:
“If the United States
of Europe is indeed to succeed and to benefit its peoples, it can only
fully succeed if all the countries of Western Europe commit themselves, as
our electors committed themselves in 1945, to the belief that Socialism is
the hope of us all” (Labour Party
Conference 1947). Note, also, the designation “United States of
Britain received the largest slice of the Marshall Aid cake, its political
leaders had to be seen to be backing the European project stipulated in the
So, again, it comes as no
surprise to find that Labour was the driving
force behind a United Europe and that the British leaders of Labour-created Socialist International and their
continental collaborators, notably SI vice-president Guy Mollet, were early advocates of European union or
Indeed, the International
acted as a propaganda mouthpiece to drum up support for the European
project. At its First Congress, it declared its support for the creation of
a united Europe, stating that “national sovereignty must be
transcended”. The SI later set up a permanent Sub-Committee on
Propaganda Technique to promote agendas like European union.
of the Socialist International: note the close links to the Council of
and the European Coal and Steel Community (later
European Union), bottom left (Rose, p. 13).
The Council of Europe, which
had been set up in London in 1949 to promote European union, was already
dominated by British Fabians and Labourites and
their collaborators among European Socialists. For example, the first
president of the Council’s Assembly was the Belgian Socialist
Paul-Henri Spaak, who had belonged to Fabian-Labour circles in war-time London and was also a
leading figure in the UN (see above).
To ensure its control over
the Council of Europe, the Socialist International set up a special
Socialist Inter-Group sitting on the Council Assembly, which
was staffed with many leading SI members (Rose, p. 11). For example,
the Group’s French president was SI vice-president Guy Mollet, a leading advocate of European unification.
Similarly, while Spaak was the first president of the Assembly (later
European Parliament) of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the
SI set up its own Socialist Group within the ECSC, to ensure a common
Socialist policy on the ECSC along SI lines (ibid.).
The identity of leading
figures in this network of organisations as well
as the interests bankrolling subversive initiatives like the movement for a
united Europe, reveal who really was behind the project.
For example, P-H Spaak was a member of the influential Spaak family of Schaerbeek,
Belgium, who were long-standing friends of the Rothschilds;
Rene Mayer, cousin of the Rothschilds and former
manager of their business empire in France, served as president of the ECSC
High Authority, etc.
In 1946, Spaak
was appointed President of the UN General Assembly.
In 1949, he was appointed President
of the Council of Europe Assembly.
In 1950, he was appointed
President of the European Movement.
In 1952, he was appointed
President of the ECSC Assembly.
In 1957, he was appointed
Secretary-General of NATO, etc.
We have seen that the UN was intended
as a form of world government and was funded by Rockefeller and associated
Similarly, the European
Movement was an organisation campaigning for a
united Europe and was co-funded by the American Committee for a United
Europe (ACUE) which was itself funded by Rockefeller, Ford and associated interests
with close links to the US Government (Aldrich, 1995; Evans-Pritchard,
The fact that both the UN and
European unification were devised and funded by the same interests shows
that the European project was part of a wider plan to rule the world by
means of a world government.
The appointment of the
Socialist Spaak to leading positions in both the
UN and the ECSC shows that the political and economic unification of Europe
was part and parcel of the corporate-backed Socialist drive for a One-World
Moreover, once the European
project was in place, the same combination of Socialist politicians and
left-wing corporations pushed for British entry.
In 1965, under the Labour Government of former Fabian Society chairman
Harold Wilson, Rothschild, Rockefeller and associated interests (Shell,
Ford, FIAT, BP) set up the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) to
represent their interests (the
CBI’s first director-general was John Davies, vice-chairman and
managing director of the Shell-BP marketing venture, Shell-Mex and BP).
In the following year, Wilson
decided that Britain should join the European Community and launched a
campaign to bring this about, placing the country on a sure course for
membership and surrender of national sovereignty.
Leading Socialists and
associated financial and industrial interests represented by
Rothschild-Rockefeller outfits like the European Enterprise Group (EEG,
founded by the CBI, above) and the European Round Table of Industrialists
(ERT) – which also interlock with the Rockefellers’ Trilateral
Commission – have retained strong influence on the EU (Ratiu, pp. 297-9).
Meanwhile, the EU has proved to be a gigantic scam extracting
billions from taxpayers and business to fund institutions and organisations that promote its agenda, notably
left-wing universities and think-tanks, as well as a wide range of
internationalist projects aiming to establish a European superstate and world government.
Society itself continues to be funded by subversive EU entities like the
European Commission and the Foundation for European Progressive Studies
(FEPS), an EU-wide operation co-funded by the European Parliament, which
works for a Socialist Europe.
Socialist International and the Bilderberg Group
Group developed from meetings organised in 1952
by Fabian Socialists in collaboration with financial interests represented
by the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) a.k.a. Chatham House
and its US sister organisation, the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR). Its first conference was held in 1954 at the Bilderberg Hotel near Arnhem,
In addition to international
money interests represented by David Rockefeller, members of the Rothschild
family and associates, Socialist International leaders were involved in the
Bilderberg project from the start. Notable among
these were members of the Fabian Society executive committee Hugh Gaitskell
and Denis Healey.
Healey was a member of the
Fabian Society from the early 1940s to the early 1980s. As a member of the
Fabian Society’s International Bureau Advisory Committee, he was a
leading figure in Fabian Society and Labour Party
foreign policy as well as being instrumental in organising
the meetings that created the Socialist International, writing the first
draft of its Declaration of Socialist Principles, while also writing
speeches for its chairman Morgan Phillips.
Healey became a long-time
member of the Bilderberg steering committee and
Chatham House councillor. Another leading figure
involved in the Bilderberg project was SI
vice-president Guy Mollet.
The involvement of leading
Socialists and international bankers in the Bilderberg
shows that the Group was a kind of liaison organisation
between International Socialism and International Finance designed to
co-ordinate foreign policy among politicians and money interests on both
sides of the Atlantic.
In particular, the Bilderberg Group has played a pivotal role in the
creation of international organisations pursuing
the world government agenda of corporate interests, like the European Coal
and Steel Community (ECSC) which later became the “Common
Market” and the EU. Bilderberg co-founder Denis Healey has admitted that
the Group aims to achieve a “united global
In addition to the Rockefellers, Shell
(Rothschild) interests who co-founded the Bilderberg
have maintained a leading role in the Group and associated projects at
national and international level.
From 1971 to 1974, Labour peer and Shell
head of research, Lord Victor Rothschild, served as founding director of
the Central Policy Review Staff (CPRS), the cabinet think-tank advising the
Despite the “expert” advice,
Britain’s Socialist-controlled economy was left in tatters and had to
be “saved” in 1976 by Bilderberger
Healey (who served as Chancellor) by conveniently asking for a $4 billion
bailout from the Rockefeller-controlled IMF (see above).
Unconcerned with the poor results of
“expert” Shell advice, Labour Prime Minister and leading Fabian Society member James Callaghan in 1978 appointed
Geoffrey Chandler, a left-wing Shell executive of over 20 years, as
director-general of the National Economic Development Council (NEDC), a Fabian-Labour outfit tasked with co-ordinating the
interests of CBI, Trade Union Congress (TUC) and Government.
Bilderberger Healey himself was appointed
NEDC chairman and in 1979 joined Arthur Knight, Bilderberg
director and member of the CBI economic committee, on the
Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, etc.
All this clearly exposes Socialism as the
handmaid of monopolist corporations cynically feigning “social and
environmental responsibility” as a smokescreen for undemocratic
Although the stated objectives of the
Socialist International’s very first declaration were to
“liberate peoples from dependence on a minority which owned or
controlled the means of production”; to prevent “the
concentration of economic power in the hands of a few”; and to create
“a system in which the public interest takes precedence over the
interest of private profit”, it has achieved the opposite,
effectively helping to create a world system in which economic power is
concentrated in the hands of a few multinational corporations of which
leading Socialists (notably, Denis Healey, Tony Blair, Lord Mandelson, Gerhard Schroder,
etc.) have been and are close collaborators.
John and Entrikin, J Nicholas, The Marshall Plan Today: Model and
Metaphor, London, 2004.
Richard J., “OSS, CIA and European Unity: The American Committee on
United Europe, 1948-60”, International
History Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, London, Nov. 1995.
John, The Labour Party and Foreign
Policy: A History, Abingdon, Oxon, 2007.
Curtis B., Franklin Roosevelt, My
Exploited Father-in-Law, 1968, 1982 ed., Institute for Historical
Review, Torrance, CA.
De Villemarest, Pierre, Facts & Chronicles Denied To The Public, vol. 2, “The
Secrets of Bilderberg”, 2003, English
trans. Slough, Berkshire, 2004.
Ambrose, “Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs”, Daily Telegraph, 19 Sept. 2000.
Healey, Denis, The Time of My Life, London, 2006.
Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway: High Road to Socialism in the
U.S.A., Chicago, IL, 1966.
Ratiu, Ioan, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy, Richmond, 2012.
Saul, The Socialist International,
Nikolai, The Socialist International,
English translation, Moscow, 1984.
Dan, The Invisible Government,
Boston, MA, 1962.
Socialist Affairs: The Journal of
the Socialist International,
Socialist International Information, London, 1951-1970.
Ollie, “1975 economic fears are laid bare”, BBC News, 29 Dec. 2005.
’Revolt on the Right’: UKIP and the Fabian
Crimea, Ukraine and the Anglo-American New World Order
Nelson Mandela: “President of the World” or
Diversity is Not a Catholic Value
it’s Saturday, it’s the Germans again – or why the Mail has lost the plot
a British revolution
Do white people have a future in South Africa?
Conservatives: The Inklings in Their Political Context
there a “need” for immigrants?
The Labour Party, a puppet of
the Fabian Society
The truth about the Labour
truth about the Fabian Society
The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy against humanity
Socialism’s prescient critics
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism
Britain divided by Islam, survey finds
Abolish this corrupt chamber – the House of
Commons, that is
The Real Churchill
The last days of a white world
A Webb of Lies
Socialism and Incentives
Ratiu, Ioan, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy: How an
international elite is taking over and destroying Europe, America and the
World, Richmond, 2012.
Quigley, Carroll, The Anglo-American Establishment: From
Rhodes to Cliveden, GSG & Associates, San
Pedro, CA, 1981.
Martin, Rose, Fabian
Freeway: High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A., Chicago,
Eric D., The Fabian
Socialist Contribution to the Communist Advance, Melbourne, 1964.
Dorril, Stephen, MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations, London, 2001.
Horowitz, David &
Poe, Richard, The Shadow Party: How
George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties
Radicals seized control of the Democratic Party, Nashville, TN, 2006.
Ye’or, Bat, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, Madison, NJ,
Bawer, Bruce, While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying The West From
Within, New York, NY, 2006.
et al., The Black Book of Communism:
Crimes, Terror, Repression, Engl. translation, Cambridge, MA and
Williamson, Kevin, The Politically Incorrect Guide to
Socialism, Washington, DC,
Hitchens, Peter, The Abolition of Britain: From Winston Churchill to Princess Diana,
Knight, Nigel, Churchill: The Greatest Briton Unmasked,
Newton Abbot, Devon, 2008.
Docherty, Gerry & MacGregor, James, Hidden
History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, Edinburgh, 2013.