Socialism exposed







The Fabian

Society: the

masters of




Revealed: the Socialist International


The truth about the European Union











The Oxford





the EDL




The Migration Observatory: immigration as an instrument for world government and Socialism


by Cassivellaunus, 25 July 2013



As documented elsewhere, the policies of left-of-centre parties like Labour show that the British Left has a long tradition of systematic support for immigration. In the present analysis we look at the pro-immigration stance of an organisation claiming to be “unbiased” and “independent” on the issue of immigration.    


The Migration Observatory (MO) was set up in 2011 by Oxford University’s Centre on Migration Policy and Society (COMPAS) to provide an independent source of information about immigrants and immigration.


The Observatory explains the word “independent” as meaning that it does not approach any issue with a particular conclusion in mind and that the analysis it offers does not aim to support the views of any parties or interest groups.


The Observatory acknowledges that it might be accused of bias and encourages anyone concerned about immigration to visit their website, read their materials and decide for themselves.


The following is a resume of what we found on visiting its website (at, last accessed on 24 July 2013) and after examining some of the materials offered there as well as on the websites of associated organisation such as COMPAS, the Migration Observatory’s parent organisation of which the MO is a part and at which the latter is based.


In our view, it is clear from publications like Us and Them? The dangers of immigration controls by COMPAS research fellow Bridget Anderson (2013) that COMPAS is a pro-immigrant organisation.


Could a COMPAS project like the Migration Observatory, whose team appears to be mostly of foreign extraction, be any less pro-immigrant?


In our attempt to answer this question we found that MO’s acting director, Dr Scott Blinder (former senior researcher at COMPAS), is a political scientist specialising in political psychology – a left-wing topic promoted by leading Fabians like Graham Wallas and often used for mass political propaganda and manipulation. Dr Blinder also holds a PhD in political science from pro-immigrant University of Chicago.


We also found that MO’s senior researcher Dr Carlos Vargas-Silva (who, like Dr Blinder has been a researcher at COMPAS) has been an immigration consultant with various pro-immigrant organisations like the World Bank, the European Commission, the United Nations and the International Migration Institute (IMI), Oxford.


As an economist, Vargas-Silva’s concerns revolve around the economic implications of immigration. In his own words:


“There is general agreement among economists that migration has benefits for economic growth … The theoretical and most of the empirical work done by economists on immigration and economic growth largely reflects the view that immigration has positive growth implications” (Vargas-Silva, 2012).


As shown below, this positive view of immigration is shared by the economists of COMPAS and the Migration Observatory alike.


Other officers of the International Migration Institute involved in the Observatory’s work and analysis include:


Dr Mathias Czaika, research officer, IMI




Dr Hein de Haas, senior research officer and co-director, IMI. Dr de Haas is professor of migration and development at the United Nations-Maastricht University Graduate School of Governance (UNU-MERIT/MGSoG), Netherlands; has acted as consultant or adviser to a string of pro-immigration organisations like the European Union (EU), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) and the International Organisation for Migration (IOM); and has authored a number of pro-immigration publications.  


Immigration, Socialism and global finance


According to the COMPAS website, the organisation aims to explore the dynamics that drive and facilitate migration. However, we were unable to find any materials on the role played by financial interests (such as multinational corporations and grant-making foundations) and their political and academic collaborators in driving and facilitating immigration, even though the influence of financial interests on organisations determining public policy is known to researchers (Domhoff, 1983). A PhD dissertation with the interesting title “Message Received: How Elites Influence Public Opinion on Immigration” (by Dr Blinder’s collaborator Lydia Lundgren) was not available online.


The above also applies to the Migration Observatory (see the Observatory’s report of 5 Apr. 2011). On its website, the Observatory provides a link to a Financial Times article to which Dr Martin Ruhs, senior economist with COMPAS and later Observatory director contributes the opinion that immigration is a “significant subsidy to the UK public sector” (Boxell & Fray, 2010). The Observatory appears to ignore the article’s opening line, in which the authors state their finding that British business leaders have long been fans of immigration because it gives them access to a plentiful supply of cheaper workers.


Similarly, the Observatory’s report discussing what causes people to oppose or support immigration (Blinder, 2011) analyses data based on age, income or geographic location, without giving due consideration to political persuasion or connections with financial interests. The report contents itself with stating that those with university degrees are less likely to want to see immigration reduced (p. 2), but makes no attempt to investigate whether the domination of universities by left-wing ideas might be a contributive factor, etc.


Another paper by Blinder published the following year casually concedes that the “data collection was not embedded in a large-scale political attitudes survey” (Blinder, 2012, p. 13), without stating what he intends to do about it.


Instead, following in the footsteps of Walter Lippmann – America’s leading Fabian in the first half of the 20th century and the first American to advocate applied psychology in the promotion of Socialism – Blinder attempts to shift the focus of the immigration debate from immigration to the public’s perception of immigration which (following Lippmann) he refers to as “pictures in our head” and “imagined immigration”.


The fact is that the lack of a clear definition of who is an immigrant doesn’t mean we must passively await the outcome of endless philosophical deliberations while the country is being transformed beyond recognition by forces the Left imagines to be (in the words of Peter Sutherland) “beyond any of us and any one government” (Sutherland, 15 Jun. 2012, p. 3). Under the present circumstances, reducing the numbers of any immigrants must be better than allowing the situation to go on unchallenged and unchanged.


Meanwhile, there are other important issues that ought to be addressed. For example:


·    Is population replacement (which is what continuous immigration amounts to) for the sake of “economic growth” morally and ethically acceptable?


·    What are the long-term benefits of immigration to the population being replaced?


·    What are the implications for British democracy when public opposition to immigration is ignored or suppressed by governments elected to represent the public?    


These and other omissions prompted us to look into these organisations’ own connections. On closer investigation, the Migration Observatory’s links to the International Migration Institute proved to be particularly revealing.


The IMI is a member of the Oxford Martin School (OMS), a massive operation with 33 research institutes and over 300 academics which was founded by James Martin – a left-wing futurologist and long-time computer scientist with Rockefeller-controlled IBM.


OMS’ director is professor of globalisation Ian Goldin, a South African for whom immigration has been a life-long passion, who holds a MSc from the pro-immigrant London School of Economics (LSE) and who believes we should all “think of ourselves as Africans” (Goldin, 2013).


Like Dr Ruhs and other economists associated with the above Oxford institutes, Prof Goldin looks at immigration from an economic point of view, is committed to changing public perception in favour of immigrants and immigration, and belongs to a growing number of foreign and British academics using Oxford University to make Britain a multicultural and multiracial nation at all costs, in effect obliterating its culture, civilisation and indigenous population.


Significantly, before taking the post of OMS director, Prof Goldin served as vice-president of the World Bank (2003-2006) as well as head of the Bank’s collaboration with the United Nations.


Before that, Prof Goldin was principal economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), London, another pro-immigrant institution set up in 1991 by Jacques Attali, a long-time Rothschild associate, former adviser to France’s Socialist President François Mitterrand and himself a committed Marxist and advocate of world government.


From 1996 to 2001 Prof Goldin was chief executive and managing director of the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) during which time he served as adviser to President Nelson Mandela and received the World Economic Forum’s ominously-named Global Leader of Tomorrow (GLT) Award along with Victor Chu (see below). Other recipients of the Award have included leading politicians like Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy and José Manuel Barroso; Rothschild associates like Vincent Bolloré and Felix Rohatyn; directors of global banking giants like JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs and many other members of the world’s new ruling class.


The GLT Award was given to persons who had achieved a position of considerable influence and responsibility, had shown a commitment to public affairs (code word for left-wing projects) and were committed to WEF’s principles and objectives. Those elected for the Award were active members of the Global Leaders of Tomorrow (later renamed Young Global Leaders) Community for two years, after which they were expected to serve a further three years as supporting members.


This raises some interesting implications: for example, Prime Minister Tony Blair, who had received the GLT Award in 1993, was a supporting member of the WEF’s Global Leaders Community at the time of assuming office in 1997 and, in theory at least, was expected to further the objectives of the WEF and its strategic partners (hand-picked for their alignment with the WEF agenda) like banking and industrial giants Chevron, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Saudi Aramco and, in particular, the Rockefeller Foundation which has special status as strategic foundation partner.


At any rate, Blair’s connections with Rockefeller and associated interests clearly stretch from his affiliation with the World Economic Forum in the early 1990s to his position of chairman of the J P Morgan International Advisory Council after leaving office in 2007 and explain his globalist and immigrationist policies while in office and after.


In addition to Prof Goldin, Oxford Martin School’s advisory council includes:


Victor Chu, chairman, First Eastern Investment Group, Hong Kong; member, foundation board, World Economic Forum (WEF) alongside Peter Sutherland, former director-general, World Trade Organisation, chairman and managing director, Goldman Sachs International (for Sutherland’s pro-immigrant stance see Sutherland, 15 June 2012 and similar publications); Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman, WEF, member, advisory board, Investcorp (an Arab League-Chase Manhattan Bank joint venture); and Christine Lagarde, managing director, International Monetary Fund


Mo Ibrahim, founder, Mo Ibrahim Foundation, which promotes “good governance” (i.e., governance promoting the interests of left-wing international finance and its political collaborators) in Africa


Pascal Lamy, director general, World Trade Organisation, chair, Oxford Martin Commission for Future Generations (whose vice-chair is Ian Goldin)


Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, former managing director, World Bank; Minister of Finance, Nigeria


Zhou Qifeng, president, Beijing University


Amartya Sen, professor of economics, Harvard University; trustee, Economists for Peace and Security; husband of Emma Rothschild (daughter of Labour peer Lord Victor Rothschild and director of the United Nations Foundation, described below)


Nicholas (Lord) Stern, professor of economics and government, LSE, chair, (Rothschild-associated) Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSE.


Joseph Stiglitz, former senior vice-president, World Bank, professor of international affairs, (Rockefeller-associated) Columbia University; collaborator of left-wing billionaire George Soros (who is a leading member and co-funder of Oxford Martin School); collaborator of left-wing economist Michael Rothschild; founder of the global think-tank Institute for Policy Dialogue (IPD), which is funded by the allied Rockefeller, Ford and MacArthur Foundations.


The International Migration Institute is also part of the Oxford Department of International Development a.k.a. Queen Elisabeth House (QEH), which was established with funds provided by Oppenheimer interests (the South African diamond and gold magnates) who reportedly also funded the Socialist African National Congress (ANC) party whose leader Nelson Mandela, a member of the South African Communist Party (Freeman & Flanagan, 2012), was a friend and collaborator of David Rockefeller from whom he received the David Rockefeller Bridging Leadership Award.


The Oppenheimers themselves are closely connected with the WEF, Jonathan Oppenheimer of De Beers, Development Bank of Southern Africa and former senior vice-president of Anglo American (De Beers’ twin company), having joined the WEF’s Global Leaders of Tomorrow in 2002.


COMPAS and the Migration Observatory’s association with Oxford organisations like the International Migration Institute and Oxford Martin School already reveal close links to leading figures among left-wing, pro-immigrant financial interests, international organisations and academic institutions promoting world government and Socialism.


·     Financial interests and associated foundations:


-  Rockefeller, Rothschild, Goldman Sachs, George Soros


-  Rockefeller, Ford, MacArthur and Open Society foundations


·     International organisations involved in global governance: United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, World Economic Forum, World Trade Organisation, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development


·     Academic institutions and associated research institutes promoting the agenda of the above interests:


- London School of Economics, Oxford University, Harvard University, Columbia University, Beijing University


- Oxford Martin School, International Migration Institute, COMPAS, Migration Observatory


The close connections between financial and political interests on one hand, and organisations carrying out research and determining public policy on immigration, on the other hand, are well-known to social scientists and researchers. They have been acknowledged, among others, by Dr de Haas himself (Berriane & de Haas, pp. 9-10) albeit only in relation to organisations seeking to restrict immigration, while ignoring such connections in the case of pro-immigration research centres such as those under discussion.


To redress this omission, it is necessary to note that on account of the interests they hold around the world, leading international businessmen, bankers and industrialists have long subscribed to an internationalist outlook. David Rockefeller in his memoirs dedicates an entire chapter to his internationalism (and that of his family) and support for internationalist projects (Rockefeller, pp. 404-19). Inevitably, this internationalist outlook influences and motivates the multinational corporations, grant-making foundations and associated organisations set up or financed by these interests (Domhoff, 1983).


The above interests’ internationalism has resulted in their making common cause with internationalist political systems like Socialism. For example, the Rockefellers and associated think-tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – which largely controls the US State Department – were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations Organisation which, from inception, was run by Socialists (Ratiu, pp. 188-90; Griffin, pp. 110, 114, 117-8).


The UN has remained under the domination of the Rockefellers and their close associates like former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who is a member of the Rockefeller-controlled J P Morgan International Advisory Council as well as a member of the board of the United Nations Foundation (UNF) through which the said interests fund and control the UN.


The UNF itself is a Rockefeller foundation. It was founded by Robert Edward (“Ted”) Turner, former vice-chairman and major shareholder of the Rockefeller-controlled media giant Time Warner, whose president at the time of UNF’s founding (1998) was long-time Rockefeller associate Richard Parson. The UNF is run by Turner as chairman and Kathy Calvin, former president of AOL Time Warner Foundation, as president and CEO, and works closely with the Rockefeller Foundation.


The UN’s pro-immigrant stance is evident among other things from statements by the head of the UN Forum on Migration and Development, Peter Sutherland (Sutherland, 15 Jun. 2012; Sutherland, 20 Jun. 2012; Wheeler, 2012) and needs no further introduction.


Another case in point is left-wing academic institutions – like Chicago, Columbia and Harvard Universities in the US and the London School of Economics in the UK – which have long maintained close links both to financial interests like the Rockefellers and to Socialist organisations like the Fabian Society and have accordingly promoted an internationalist and pro-immigrant outlook, in addition to their large percentage of foreign students whom they have attracted and on whom they now depend for income.


The LSE (full name London School of Economics and Political Science) was founded by the Fabian Society with money bequeathed to it for the express purpose of “furthering its propaganda, objects and Socialism” (Cole, p. 43), has enjoyed the support of financial interests like the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and is notorious for the large community of foreign students it harbours.


Being chaired by Peter Sutherland himself, it is not in the least surprising to find that the LSE is a leading advocate of immigration. The fact that it is backed by Mr Sutherland who has also chaired British Petroleum (BP), the Rockefellers’ Trilateral Commission (Europe) of which he is currently honorary chairman and Goldman Sachs International, as well as by Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vincent Cable (who believes that foreign students are “good for the country”) once again demonstrates the convergence of interests – and policies – on the part of Left-dominated academic institutions and business interests (for the close links between these interests see Ratiu, 2012.)


Having examined the wider background on which it came into being and on which it operates, we can now return to the Migration Observatory itself. Its own links to international sponsors of Socialism, world government and immigration are confirmed by its declared funders: Unbound Philanthropy, Barrow Cadbury Trust and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).


Unbound Philanthropy is a New York-based, private grant-making foundation that is overtly pro-immigrant and funds left-wing, pro-immigrant organisation like Fabian-controlled Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and British Future.


Its executive director, Taryn Higashi, has worked in various pro-immigrant roles such as deputy director of Ford Foundation’s (a Rockefeller-controlled operation) human rights unit and member of the advisory board, International Migration Initiative, a project of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.


Unbound Philanthropy’s programme director for the UK is Will Somerville who holds a master’s degree in social policy and planning from the pro-immigrant London School of Economics and has been a consultant with left-wing and pro-immigrant organisations like the Barrow Cadbury Trust and Open Society Foundations.


Somerville has also served as policy adviser on immigration issues in the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit under the Blair-Brown regime as well as head of policy on asylum and immigration at the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), an organisation created through the 1976 Race Relations Act by Labour Home Secretary Roy Jenkins, former Fabian Society chairman and member of the Rockefellers’ Trilateral Commission.


Barrow Cadbury Trust (BCT) is a pro-immigrant charitable foundation controlled by chocolate manufacturer Cadbury. It operates in partnership with the Fabian Society and funds the latter’s projects.


For example, BCT trustee Ruth Cadbury has been a member of the Fabian Society’s Commission on Life Chances.


In 2007, the Fabian Society and the Barrow Cadbury Trust took part in secret discussions on “progressive migration policy” with various Labour politicians including Immigration Minister Liam Byrne (Shell, 2011, p. 2), a Fabian Society member and co-founder of the Blairite think-tank Progress.


BCT has also provided grants to COMPASS (not to be confused with COMPAS, above), a Brownite pressure group set up in 2003 and headed by the Fabian Neal Lawson.


BCT’s CEO Sara Llewellin serves as vice-chairman of the Association of Charitable Foundations (ACF), whose nominations committees include Anna Southhall of BCT and Simon Buxton of the Fabian-controlled Noel Buxton Trust (NBT), a foundation named after Fabian Lord Noel-Buxton. Llewellin is also a member of the Governing Council of the European Foundations Centre.


Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The ESRC – which also funds COMPAS – is a typical Fabian operation. It was founded in 1965 under the government of former Fabian Society chairman Harold Wilson [FS member from the 1930s to 1984] and its first chief executive was leading Fabian Michael (later Lord) Young [FS member from the 1930s to 1981], who was responsible for the creation of over 60 like-minded organisations.


The ESRC was originally known as Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and was clearly a clone of the US organisation of the same name. The latter was founded in 1923 by Charles E. Merriam, who was associated with the American Fabian League and the London Fabian Society, in collaboration with the American Economic Association, itself founded by Fabian Society founders Thomas Davidson and Sidney Webb (Martin, pp. 123-4, 281).


Both the SSRC and the ESRC have been used to channel funds to like-minded institutions and organisations. But while the American SSRC has been bankrolled by the Rockefellers and associated interests (Berman, pp. 105, 107), its British counterpart has been funded by the Department for Business, which was created by Tony Blair’s Fabian-Labour administration in 2007 and is conveniently run by pro-immigrant Lib Dem Business Secretary Vincent Cable himself, a former member of the Labour and Social Democratic Parties. This has led to the absurd and scandalous situation where a department of a Conservative government ostensibly opposed to Socialism and immigration funds a Socialist and pro-immigration institution. Unfortunately, it is a situation that has become typical of Fabian-dominated British society.


The American SSRC and its UK counterpart have always maintained close links to each other and to other Fabian operations like the LSE. Moreover, like the LSE, in addition to close Fabian connections, the ESRC interlocks with international financial interests.


For example, the ESRC governing council is chaired by Dr Alan Gillespie, former executive director of Rockefeller-CFR-controlled Citigroup/Citibank and current partner and managing director of Goldman Sachs.


This means that while the ESRC is being provided with funds by the British Government (and the taxpayer), the way the funds are used is decided by private financial interests with a left-wing agenda in collaboration with left-wing political organisations like the Fabian Society.


Indeed, we find that another notable member of the ESRC council is David Walker, long-time journalist with an array of left-wing papers like The Times, the Independent and the Guardian. Tellingly, Mr Walker has been a member of the Fabian Society’s Commission on Future Spending Choices and has served as chairman of the Migration Observatory’s media advisory board. He is married to Polly Toynbee, a leading Guardian columnist and herself a leading member of the Fabian Society, having served as its deputy treasurer.


The Migration Observatory has been accused of “trying to use the status of Oxford University to peddle Left-wing views” and of receiving funds from organisations seeking to influence or change public attitudes towards immigrants (Letts, 2011; Slack, Seamark & English, 2013), which raises legitimate questions about its alleged “independence” and “lack of bias” – though the same may be said to apply to entire Oxford University departments like the Department of International Development and their various projects like the International Migration Institute and the Oxford Martin School (see above).


Perhaps more importantly, others have noted that there are “vast amounts of money” behind organisations promoting a pro-immigration message and have pointed at “big business” and “large city firms” as those responsible (West, 2013).


Such concerns have been largely confirmed by our own findings which show that the Migration Observatory’s network of directors, supporters and collaborators follows an established pattern characterised by a toxic mix of financial interests and Socialist politics.


In conclusion, the Migration Observatory cannot be deemed independent and unbiased in the sense of existing independently of, and being unconnected with, vested interests, be they political or financial. On the contrary, it is dependent on its financial supporters and exists and operates as part of an international web of financial, philanthropic, academic and political organisations seeking to impose Socialism, world government and population change (or replacement through immigration) on an unsuspecting British public.


(This article was last updated on 6 August 2013)



See also:


The Oxford Martin School


The Fabian Society


Nelson Mandela: “President of the World” or “murderous terrorist”?



Berman, Edward H., The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy: The Ideology of Philanthropy, Albany, NY, 1983.


Berriane, Mohamed and de Haas, Hein, Les recherches sur les migrations africaines : Méthodes et méthodologies innovantes, Paris, 2012.


Blinder, Scott, “UK Public Opinion toward Migration: Determinants of Attitude,” Migration Observatory report, Oxford, 27 May 2011.


Boxell, James and Frey, Keith, “Migrants give boost to public finances,” Financial Times, 3 Oct. 2010.


Cole, Margaret Isobel (ed), The Webbs and Their Work, London, 1949, quoted in Pugh, Patricia, Educate, Agitate, Organize: 100 Years of Fabian Socialism, London, 1984, p. 54.


Domhoff, G. William, Who Rules America Now?, 1983, reprinted Prospect Heights, IL, 1997. 


Freeman, Colin and Flanagan, Jane, “Nelson Mandela ‘proven’ to be a member of the Communist Party after decades of denial,” Daily Telegraph, 8 Dec. 2012.


Goldin, Ian, “Exceptional People: How Migration Shaped Our World and Will Define Our Future,” Prof Ian Goldin, Director, Oxford Martin School, talks to Hein de Haas, Co-Director, International Migration Institute, May 2013, webcast on See also Goldin, Ian, Exceptional People: How Migration Shaped Our World and Will Define Our Future, Woodstock, Oxfordshire, 2011, pp. 12, ff.


Griffin, Edward G., The Fearful Master: A Second Look at the United Nations, Belmont, MA, 1964.


Letts, Quentin, “Is this the best way to honour Diana?”, Daily Mail, 2 Sept. 2011.


Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway: High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A., Chicago, IL, 1966.


Migration Observatory, “Top Ten Problems in the Evidence Base for Public Debate and Policy-Making on Immigration in the UK,” Oxford, 5 Apr. 2011.


Ratiu, Ioan, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy: How an international elite is taking over and destroying Europe, America and the World, Richmond, 2012.


Rockefeller, David, Memoirs, New York, NY, 2002.


Shell, Tony, “Progressive Politics: Being Rid of the English,” September 2011.


Slack, James, Seamark, Michael and English, Rebecca, “Princess Diana fund cynically hijacked by the Left: How money is being diverted to pro-immigration campaign fund,” Daily Mail, 12 Apr. 2013.


Sutherland, Peter, “A Constructive Attitude to Migration is a Moral Issue,” Address to the International Eucharistic Congress, Dublin, 15 Jun. 2012.


Sutherland, Peter in Select Committee on the European Union, House of Lords, “Inquiry on Global Approach to Migration and Mobility, Evidence Session No. 1, Wednesday 20 June 2012, 11.25 am, Witness: Mr Peter Sutherland, QQ 1-34”, uncorrected transcript, published 22 June 2012.


Vargas-Silva, Carlos, “Migration and Economic Growth,” The COMPAS Blog, 7 Feb 2012.


West, Ed, “Why are taxpayers supporting pro-immigration charities?”, Daily Telegraph, 10 May 2013.


Wheeler, Brian, “EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief,” BBC News, 21 Jun. 2012.







’Revolt on the Right’: UKIP and the Fabian Socialist

smoke-and-mirrors campaign


Crimea, Ukraine and the Anglo-American New World Order


Nelson Mandela: “President of the World” or “murderous terrorist”?


Diversity is Not a Catholic Value


If it’s Saturday, it’s the Germans again – or why the Mail has lost the plot


Towards a British revolution


Do white people have a future in South Africa?


Romantic Conservatives: The Inklings in Their Political Context


Is there a “need” for immigrants?


The Labour Party, a puppet of the Fabian Society


The truth about the Labour Party


The truth about the Fabian Society


The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy against humanity


Socialism’s prescient critics


The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism


Britain divided by Islam, survey finds


Abolish this corrupt chamber – the House of Commons, that is


The Real Churchill


The last days of a white world


A Webb of Lies


Socialism and Incentives





Recommended reading



Ratiu, Ioan, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy: How an international elite is taking over and destroying Europe, America and the World, Richmond, 2012.


Quigley, Carroll, The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden, GSG & Associates, San Pedro, CA, 1981.


Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway: High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A., Chicago, IL, 1966.


Butler, Eric D., The Fabian Socialist Contribution to the Communist Advance, Melbourne, 1964.


Dorril, Stephen, MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations, London, 2001.


Horowitz, David & Poe, Richard, The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties Radicals seized control of the Democratic Party, Nashville, TN, 2006.


Ye’or, Bat, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, Madison, NJ, 2006.


Bawer, Bruce, While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying The West From Within, New York, NY, 2006.


Courtois, Stéphane et al., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Engl. translation, Cambridge, MA and London, 1999.


Williamson, Kevin, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism, Washington, DC,



Hitchens, Peter, The Abolition of Britain: From Winston Churchill to Princess Diana, London, 2008.


Knight, Nigel, Churchill: The Greatest Briton Unmasked, Newton Abbot, Devon, 2008.


Docherty, Gerry & MacGregor, James, Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, Edinburgh, 2013.


















Get Britain Out


Big Brother



Young Britons’





Bow Group















Immigration Control





Of Europe













Copyright © 2013