The Fourth British Empire
25 May 2013
“As we look around us we see a Fourth
British Empire with characteristics of its own. At present it lacks the
individuality which is given to political institutions by a name, a
formula, a statement of principles. This very lack of formula is
characteristic of the Fourth Empire”
Vincent Hodson, 1948
The British Empire is
generally held to have been ruled by the Royal Family. In reality, the
monarch in Britain has always had to share power with members of the
aristocracy and, increasingly, with the growing liberal capitalist middle
classes, elements of which, over time, successfully usurped the power of
the Crown to become Britain’s invisible rulers.
Another misconception is that
the British Empire came to an end with its official dissolution and the
creation of the Commonwealth. As shown below, the Empire is very much alive
and kicking, only that (1) it no longer is British and (2) it is
subordinated to the international New World Order.
British Empire (1583 – 1783)
The First British Empire came
into being with the acquisition of territories outside the British Isles,
such as in North America, the Caribbean, India and later Australia, and ended
with the American Revolution of 1775 – which led to America’s
independence from Britain in 1783.
British Empire (1783 – 1848/1910)
In the wake of the American
Revolution and the loss of the North American colonies, the British Empire
entered a new phase, called the Second British Empire, in which attention
was shifted from America to Asia and, later, to Africa, where the Empire
expanded its power and influence.
The end of this Second Empire
was less abrupt than that of its predecessor, stretching over a period of
half a century, from the mid-1800s into the early 1900s. Its demise was set
in motion around the time of the 1848 Paris Commune, when the Colonies
began to be granted self-government, eventually becoming Dominions, that
is, territories nominally under British sovereignty but enjoying
self-government except as in such matters as foreign affairs (that were to
be conducted in co-operation with the United Kingdom).
This latter part of the
Second Empire is closely connected with the rise of Liberalism and its
offshoot, Socialism, as well as with the replacement of the aristocracy
with a new ruling class consisting of left-wing financial and industrial
interests. In addition, new links were forged with France, with which these
interests were connected by a common Liberal ideology and, in particular,
with America with which they had economic links.
In Britain, these interests
aimed to undermine the authority of the Crown and aristocracy (the big
landowners) in order to take control of trade and the economy. Thus, by
1850, the Empire had come to be largely run by “unseen committee
men” (Passmore Edwards) working from behind
the scenes to push the system in a Liberal, i.e., left-wing direction.
committee work was instigated by prominent Liberals like Richard Cobden, a
textile magnate with railway interests in America and his collaborator John
Passmore Edwards, a newspaper owner. These
Liberal elements were also active internationally through organisations like the Anglo-American Peace Society
which aimed to create a United States of Europe and unite the British
Empire with America under the guise of “world peace,”
“free trade” and “universal brotherhood.”
At the apex of this
unofficial power structure (or empire within empire) were power-obsessed
industrialists like Andrew Carnegie, a steel tycoon and radical journalist
who wanted to abolish the Royal Family and the House of Lords.
A special place within this elite was held by bankers and financiers like the
less radical but still left-wing Rothschild family. Their German-born
ancestor Mayer Amschel (1743-1812) had already
been one of the most influential businessmen of all times (ranked 7th in the world by Forbes).
By the late 1800s, leading
politicians like Lord Rosebery, Lord Randolph
Churchill (Winston Churchill’s father) and Arthur (later Lord)
Balfour were frequent guests at the Rothschild country houses where many of
the most important political decisions were taken (Ferguson, 2000, vol. 2,
The discovery of diamonds and
gold in South Africa greatly increased the wealth and power of these
unofficial elites. The Rothschilds became
involved – as friends and financiers – with a new group of
mining magnates, Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Beit,
Julius Wernher, among them. Their combined wealth
and influence made these elements powerful enough to virtually take over
In 1891, Natty Rothschild,
Rhodes and their collaborators formed a secret association called
“the Society of the Elect,” later known as the Milner Group, for
the purpose of taking over the Empire and creating a world government
controlled by themselves (Quigley, pp. 3, 34 ff.).
As part of this plan, the
Milner Group developed closer links with its American Wall Street
associates – the so-called Eastern Establishment consisting of J. P.
Morgan, the Rockefellers and collaborators – and set up a number of organisations to further Anglo-American relations,
including military co-operation. Chief among these were the Anglo-American
League and the Pilgrims Society.
British Empire (1910 – 1945)
At this point, the Milner
Group (so called after its leader Lord Alfred Milner, an employee of the Rothschilds at their mining company Rio Tinto) virtually ran the Empire and was responsible for
re-organising it into a Commonwealth of Nations,
creating thereby the Third British Empire.
By 1910, most colonies had
become Dominions. As part of the Commonwealth they were to become fully
independent and “equal,” yet acting in close co-operation with
each other and with Britain at the centre of this new imperial organisation.
Co-ordination of policy
between London and the rest of the Empire was ensured through the Milner
Group’s imperial conferences and foreign relation institutes
operating in close collaboration with the London Royal Institute of
International Affairs (Chatham House), while close contact with America was
maintained through RIIA’s sister organisation, the New York-based Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), the Anglo-American League and the Pilgrims Society, which
also had branches in London and New York.
Working in parallel with the
Milner Group was the Fabian Society, a political association founded in
1884 and – like the Milner Group – aiming to establish a
Socialist world order, whose leaders were friends and collaborators of
leading Milnerites like Natty Rothschild, Rosebery, Balfour and Lord Haldane.
The Fabian leadership was in
constant contact with the Milner Group through the Coefficients dining club
and other informal meetings and the two groups were in full agreement on
international plans such as the division of the world into four or five
economic blocs, the placement of colonies under an international authority
and the creation of an international government consisting of
“experts” of the Milner-Fabian sort. The Fabians also worked in
close collaboration with the Milner Group in creating the League of Nations
and associated organisations like RIIA and the
While the Milner Group was
building the power structure for the new world order, the Fabian Society
was mainly working to establish Socialism in Britain, America and
elsewhere. Like the Milner Group, the Society set up a worldwide network of
organisations to further its ends (Ratiu, 2012).
Moreover, the Fabian
Society’s activities were financially supported by the Milner Group
and associates. For example, the London School of Economics (LSE), a
university created to further the Society’s agenda and promote
Socialism, was funded by the Rothschilds and the
Rockefellers, while Lord Rosebery and Natty
Rothschild were among its early presidents.
Unsurprisingly, during this
period the British Empire (and the world) came to be more and more
dominated by the financial interests represented by the Milner Group and
its Eastern Establishment associates, who together formed what Carroll
Quigley and other historians have called “the Anglo-American
Among financial institutions
most closely associated with the Anglo-American Establishment (whose
members often served as directors, governors and chairmen of such
institutions) were: Lazard Brothers, N. M.
Rothschild & Sons, the Bank of England, J. P. Morgan & Co. and the
Rockefellers’ National City Bank.
Already in the second half of
the 19th century, Britain’s financial institutions had become
“the world’s banker.” By the early 1910s, they accounted
for 44 per cent of the world’s foreign investment (Pollard, 1985).
To further monopolise and centralise the
world’s finances, these interests and their American associates
launched various projects such as:
The US Federal Reserve System (1913)
The American International Corporation
A Gold Reserve Bank of the United States of Europe
The Bank for International Settlements
In addition to its drive for
control of the world’s finances, the Anglo-American Establishment
aimed to monopolise resources such as gold, steel
and oil, that were already largely controlled by itself.
For example, the J P Morgan-controlled Anglo American Corporation and
associated outfits controlled South Africa’s gold production –
which alone amounted to half of the world’s newly mined gold.
Between 1919 and 2004, the gold price itself was fixed daily
at the Rothschild HQ in the City of London (Daily Telegraph, 17 Apr. 2004). Oil prices were similarly
controlled by Rothschild and Rockefeller interests through operations like
Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon.
This policy brought the
British Empire into competition and eventually, conflict, with other powers
such as Germany. Henry Noel Brailsford, later a
prominent member of the Fabian International and Colonial Bureaux, referred to the First World War as “the
War of Steel and Gold” (Brailsford, 1914).
Indeed, it was openly
admitted by leading politicians of the time, including Milner Group leaders
themselves, that both wars were a struggle between countries with
resources, like Britain, America and France, and countries without
resources, like Germany, Italy and Japan (Curtis, p. 192). Needless to say,
the only reason some countries had no resources was because they had been
prevented from acquiring any by those who had monopolised
Thus, another key feature of
the Third British Empire was the two World Wars of 1914-19 and 1939-45.
British Empire (1945 – present)
The Fourth British Empire was
created in the wake of the Second World War. Like its predecessor, it was a
creation of the Anglo-American Establishment and it entailed not only a re-organisation of the Empire but a re-organisation
of the whole world into what has been called the “New World
Order” or short, “NWO.”
Establishment’s commitment to the NWO is evident from public
statements by front organisations like the
British Labour Party which in its 1939 annual
report declared that:
“The Labour Party will
not abandon, now or ever, the vision of a New World Order”
New World Order, of course, is a Socialist
order run by a Socialist world government which is in turn controlled by
the financial interests of the Anglo-American Establishment and their
The official core of the
Third British Empire and its world order was the League of Nations.
Similarly, the Fourth Empire revolves around the League’s successor,
the United Nations (established in 1945).
That the United Nations was a
creation of the Anglo-American Establishment – the driving force
behind the Fourth Empire – is evident from the over forty members of
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), along with Assistant Secretary of
State Nelson Rockefeller, who were present at the San Francisco Conference
which wrote the UN Charter, while the preamble to the Charter was written by
none other that leading Milnerite and Fourth
Empire official, General Jan Smuts.
That the United Nations is
intended to be a world government is clear from the organisations
associated with it, for example:
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Court a.k.a. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Trade Organisation (WTO)
Commission on Global Governance (CGG)
The European Union (EU), etc.
Also beyond dispute must be
that the United Nations and its New World Order are motivated by economic
(i.e., financial) interests as demonstrated by official statements like the
Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order
(Resolution A/RES/S6/3201, 1 May 1974):
the members of the United Nations … solemnly proclaim our united
determination to work urgently for the Establishment of a New International
like the UN are the official
organs of the Fourth Empire and its NWO, there is an extensive network of
semi-official and unofficial organs operating in close collaboration with
the official ones. These include:
and Social Research Council
Institute for International Affairs
Council on Foreign Relations
for War & Peace Reporting
Council of Churches
Union a.k.a. Union for the Mediterranean.
and institutions may be classified into three broad categories according to
the emphasis of their activities: (1) Atlanticist,
working for greater financial, economic and political union between Europe
and America; (2) internationalist, working for closer union between all
countries with a view to establishing world government; and (3) Socialist,
working to establish Socialism nationally and internationally. Regardless
of the category they belong to, they all work for the same common goal
which is the establishment of a Socialist World State.
Needless to say, these organisations and institutions, which were created
during the Fourth Empire, operate in unison – and often in
collaboration – with those established earlier, towards the end of
the second and beginning of the third empires, such as the Fabian Society,
the Pilgrims Society, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham
House), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), etc.
Fourth Empire: British or American?
Economic, military and
political superiority has made America the dominant element in the New
World Order. This has led some historians to describe the new international
power structure as an “American Empire” (Ferguson, 2003, pp.
However, some important facts
must be taken into consideration, for example, that an American Empire
would be impossible without British collaboration; that the City of London
remains a powerful financial centre; and that the organs of this empire
– including key financial institutions like Lazard,
Goldman Sachs and J P Morgan – have Britons on their boards.
Moreover, it is clear from
the network of organisations
on which it is built, that the Fourth Empire is an Anglo-American entity.
In fact, America and the whole New World Order itself, follows a general
British, Milner-Fabian pattern. Equally correct, therefore, would be to
speak of a Milner-Fabian, Atlantic or Rothschild-Rockefeller Empire, depending
on whether the emphasis is political, geographic or financial.
features of the Fourth Empire
Some of the most notable
features of the Fourth Empire are:
It is deliberately less visible than its
predecessors, so much so, that outsiders, or the uninitiated, may be
totally unaware of its existence. Indeed, nothing would be known about it,
were it not for the writings of its architects like Harry Hodson, former editor of the Milner Group’s Round Table, who later served as
director of the Information Ministry’s Empire Division.
It is no longer British but international with a dominant
Anglo-American core and, increasingly, Middle Eastern, Asian and African
participation. This tendency towards internationalisation
has its roots in the fact that many of the leading elements behind the
Third Empire – Alfred Milner, Alfred Beit,
the Rothschilds, the Barings, the
Astors – were of foreign extraction and
represented international rather than British interests.
clear is that we are dealing with a systematic foreign take-over of the
Empire and of Britain itself. This is the true explanation for the
increasingly anti-national behaviour of
successive British (and American) governments from the early 1900s to the present.
It no longer revolves around defined
territories and governments, but around control of resources, finances and
international relations through unofficial networks of international organisations and institutions like the ones listed
It is based on a Socialist-dominated
political model based on growing centralisation
and globalisation of financial, economic and
It is becoming more and more like a
republic, with Prime Ministers playing an increasingly presidential role,
while the Royal Family has become a puppet of the financial interests
pulling the strings from behind the scenes. As a result, it is increasingly
being used by them to publicly promote their agendas such as Islamisation and African causes, while at the same time
“popularising,” that is, abolishing
by stealth, the Monarchy itself.
The media, entertainment and advertising
industries, as well as official sports events (the Olympics, football
championships, etc.) are almost exclusively used for the purposes of the
There is growing involvement by the secret
services in building, expanding and upholding the Empire’s power
While during previous British Empires the
brunt of British imperialism was borne by other nations – notably
Ireland, India, China, Germany, etc. – as the NWO noose is
tightening, the current Empire has brought growing suffering to the British
people themselves who are in the process of losing their territory,
culture, ethnic identity and even their right to live.
Mass immigration is believed to make the
Empire militarily, economically and socially “stronger” and
“better” and is promoted through organisations
like the UN and its Forum for Migration and Development (UNFMD). From the
point of view of the nations concerned, however, mass immigration amounts
to population replacement or ethnic
Multiculturalism or the imposition of
cultural diversity at the expense of indigenous British culture is likewise
said to make Britain “stronger” and “better” and is
being enforced through UN agencies like ECOSOC and the Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), as
well as through various regional and national organisations.
Islamification) is the systematic promotion of
Muslims, their religion and their culture in the West through
international, regional and national organisations,
such as ECOSOC, the Anna Lindh Foundation for Dialogue between Cultures (ALF), the
Alliance of Civilisations (AoC),
universities like the London School of Economics (LSE), etc.
Focus on Africa. The discovery of diamonds
and gold in South Africa in the late 1800s had already made the African
Continent a key source of income for the Second and Third Empires’
invisible rulers (the Milner Group).
paramount importance to the Empire is evident from the fact that the
Empire’s African interests had already come to be known as “the
Fourth British Empire” in the 1930s (Ensor,
1936, p. xxii). Naturally, Africa remains a central concern of the Empire, indeed, it is the Fourth Empire’s defining
In 1947, the
Colonial Office described Africa as “the only continental space from
which we can still hope to draw reserves of economic and military
strength” (Callaghan, p. 174). The “development” of
Africa, that is, its opening to exploitation by international money
interests, was inserted into
the 1950 Schuman Plan – which provided the
basis for the European Coal and Steel Community (later European Union)
– by Rene Mayer, a cousin of the French Rothschilds
and former manager of their business empire (Monnet,
motivated by the Fourth Empire’s African interests include the Organisation of African Unity (later African Union),
the African Economic Community and, disturbingly, the plan to unite Europe
with Africa. The latter was already promoted by the Anglo-American
Establishment in the 1960s and a “Euro-African axis” is
currently being constructed around the Mediterranean Union/Union for the
Mediterranean (MU/UfM), a Rothschild-Rockefeller
project aiming to bring about economic, political and cultural union
between the European Union and North Africa (Ratiu,
Empire’s development of Africa and associated foreign aid programmes have resulted in unprecedented growth in
Africa’s population and millions of Africans are expected to migrate to
Europe in search of employment (Sutherland, p. 8). While
this provides Europe’s ruling financial interests with cheap labour, it also contributes to the population
replacement (or ethnic cleansing) already taking place in many European
countries, including Britain.
It becomes clear from the above
facts that state-imposed mass immigration, multiculturalism and Islamisation, along with other negative and destructive
developments characteristic of the Fourth Empire are driven by the
ever-growing dependence of the international money power on resources
extracted from foreign territories like Africa and the Middle East. Such
developments show that the ruling elites in Britain and other Western
countries have become the enemies of the nations they have brought under
their control. They are the enemy within
that needs to be eliminated if any positive changes are to be made to the
propaganda, manipulation and mass control
The Fourth Empire is aware of
potential opposition to its authority on the part of the nations it has subjugated,
especially the British and American people. Therefore, it has sought to
deflect attention from itself by creating artificial and non-existing
enemies. The following are a few examples.
The “Fourth Reich.” In the 1940s, while the Fourth
Empire itself was spreading its tentacles across the globe, its architects
came up with the clever device of raising the alarm over an alleged
“Fourth Reich” (German Fourth Empire) in South America.
Although the story was revived by the media and the intelligence services
in the 60s and 90s, it was, of course, totally unfounded and turned out to
have originated with the Establishment mouthpiece Daily Express (Dorril, pp. 96-7).
The Cold War. The “Cold War” was a period of
tension between the Anglo-American Empire and its Russian Communist
(Soviet) counterpart. It lasted for nearly half a century following World
War II, it saw an enormous input of resources into an unprecedented
military and intelligence build-up and, like similar projects of the
Anglo-American Establishment, it was a scam.
To be sure, the danger of the
spread of Russian Communism was very real, but the Soviet Union never
really had the resources to conduct a protracted military campaign against
the West. The real danger was that Britain’s own Stalinist Labour Party was in the process of infiltrating and
taking over the country by stealth in line with the designs of its Fabian
Indeed, there was increased
contact between the Fabian Society and the Labour
Party on one hand, and the Soviet regime on the other hand, during this
period. Thus, the Cold War only served as a smokescreen for Labour’s systematic conversion of British society
to Socialism (which mirrored similar activities of the Democratic Party in
the USA) while being bankrolled by the very same financial interests who
claimed to be fighting Communism.
Anti-racism. To deflect attention from its secret designs to
change the racial, social and cultural make-up of the country through the
deliberate import of millions of immigrants, the Establishment shifted the
blame to its critics, accusing them of “racism” and branding
them “fascists” and “Nazis,” thereby suppressing
legitimate opposition and dissent.
Foreign aid. In suppressing opposition to its policies of mass
immigration, the Establishment has successfully turned British people
against themselves, making them uncritically accept the official policy of
raising the interests of immigrants and foreigners in general, and those
from the Third World in particular, above those of indigenous Britons. The
only purpose of the indigenous British population seems now to be to
provide the Third World – from where the Empire extracts its wealth
and power – with more and more financial and other forms of aid,
while welcoming millions of uninvited strangers and facilitating their
take-over of the country at the expense of indigenous Britons.
The “War on Terror.”
The war on Islamic terrorism is another Fourth Empire project that
faithfully follows the Cold War pattern. In the same way as the Cold War
claimed to fight Communism while promoting Socialism as a
“moderate” form of Communism, the war on Islamic terrorism is a
sham that promotes “moderate” Islam as an
“antidote” to its more radical manifestations, in effect
leading to the gradual Islamisation of Western
The above examples clearly
illustrate an established pattern of diversion, misdirection and deception
by which Britain’s secret government deflects attention from its own
actions in order to protect itself and the interests behind it. However,
while such tactics are to be expected from the Establishment, it is
disturbing to find similar behaviour even among
the Establishment’s self-declared opponents.
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
leader Nigel Farage has correctly identified Britain’s
three main political parties as “social democratic”
(BBC News, 7 Oct. 2006). But in that case, his priority should be not leaving
the EU, but fighting the creeping Socialism that is stifling the country.
As a former employee of Rothschild-associated banks like Natexis (currently Natixis), Mr Farage ought to know who
the string-pullers behind Socialism are. After all, the Conservatives’
long-time chief policy adviser, Oliver Letwin, is
not only a Rothschild director but also a former member of the Fabian
Moreover, UKIP has shown
itself to be less reliable on issues like immigration than some of its
supporters are willing to admit. Its 2010 manifesto pledged to introduce
“a 5-year freeze on all settled immigration” (UKIP London News, issue 8, 2010). By
2013, it had reviewed its policy to allow 50,000 (or more) in, which happened to match very closely the target of the
“social democratic” Conservatives …
Meanwhile, while politicians
of all denominations are busy changing their policies many times over to
suit themselves (and the money interests behind them), the Empire’s
evil designs are proceeding according to plan. The only realistic remedy,
therefore, is to tear the veil of Establishment propaganda, disinformation
and lies, look at the facts as
presented by objective observers and supported by verifiable evidence, and
then put up organised resistance to a system that
is as thoroughly undemocratic as it is dysfunctional and corrupt. In other
words, put democracy and sanity back into the system before it is too late.
BBC News, “UKIP ‘voice of British
democracy’”, 7 Oct. 2006.
Brailsford, Henry Noel, The War of
Steel and Gold: A Study of the Armed Peace, London, 1914.
The Labour Party and Foreign Policy:
A History, Abingdon, Oxon, 2007.
Lionel, World War, Its Cause and Cure,
London and New York, NY, 1945.
Daily Telegraph, “Rothschild’s farewell to a golden
age,” 17 Apr. 2004.
John, The Empire Project: The Rise
and Fall of the British World-System, 1830-1970, Cambridge, 2009.
Dorril, Stephen, MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations, London, 2001.
Ensor, R. C. K., England 1870 -1914, Oxford, 1936.
Niall, The House of Rothschild, 2
vols., New York, NY, 2000.
Niall, Empire: How Britain made the modern world,
London, 2003, Penguin Books special edition London 2012.
Hodson, Henry V., Twentieth-Century Empire, London, 1948.
Jean, Memoirs, London, 1978.
Edwards, John, A Few Footprints: The
Autobiography of John Passmore Edwards, 1905.
Pollard, Sidney, “Capital Exports, 1870-1914: Harmful or
Beneficial?,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser. 38/4, 1985, pp.
Quigley, Carroll, The Anglo-American Establishment: From
Rhodes to Cliveden, San Pedro, CA, 1981.
Ioan, The Milner-Fabian
Conspiracy: How an international elite is taking over and destroying
Europe, America and the World, Richmond, 2012.
Peter, “A Constructive Attitude to Migration is a Moral Issue,”
Address to the International Eucharistic Congress, Dublin, 15 June 2012.
’Revolt on the Right’: UKIP and the Fabian
Crimea, Ukraine and the Anglo-American New World Order
Nelson Mandela: “President of the World” or
Diversity is Not a Catholic Value
it’s Saturday, it’s the Germans again – or why the Mail has lost the plot
a British revolution
Do white people have a future in South Africa?
Conservatives: The Inklings in Their Political Context
there a “need” for immigrants?
The Labour Party, a puppet of
the Fabian Society
The truth about the Labour
truth about the Fabian Society
The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy against humanity
Socialism’s prescient critics
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism
Britain divided by Islam, survey finds
Abolish this corrupt chamber – the House of
Commons, that is
The Real Churchill
The last days of a white world
A Webb of Lies
Socialism and Incentives
Ratiu, Ioan, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy: How an
international elite is taking over and destroying Europe, America and the
World, Richmond, 2012.
Quigley, Carroll, The Anglo-American Establishment: From
Rhodes to Cliveden, GSG & Associates, San
Pedro, CA, 1981.
Martin, Rose, Fabian
Freeway: High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A., Chicago,
Eric D., The Fabian
Socialist Contribution to the Communist Advance, Melbourne, 1964.
Dorril, Stephen, MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations, London, 2001.
Horowitz, David &
Poe, Richard, The Shadow Party: How
George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties
Radicals seized control of the Democratic Party, Nashville, TN, 2006.
Ye’or, Bat, Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, Madison, NJ,
Bawer, Bruce, While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam Is Destroying The West From
Within, New York, NY, 2006.
et al., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes,
Terror, Repression, Engl. translation, Cambridge, MA and London, 1999.
Williamson, Kevin, The Politically Incorrect Guide to
Socialism, Washington, DC,
Hitchens, Peter, The Abolition of Britain: From Winston Churchill to Princess Diana,
Knight, Nigel, Churchill: The Greatest Briton Unmasked,
Newton Abbot, Devon, 2008.
Docherty, Gerry & MacGregor, James, Hidden
History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, Edinburgh, 2013.