Angela Merkel, “new Hitler” or
Why the International Left and the financial interests behind it
want the world to see Merkel as a “new Hitler”
From Hitler to Merkel: how the
LSE-Chatham-House-FO-MI6-Daily-Mail crowd and the financial interests
behind it want the world to see Merkel.
You know that something is amiss when,
after demonising her for years, Rothschild-controlled Economist takes to backing Mrs Merkel as “Europe’s leader” on
the grounds that she can be counted on to push
stronger financial union, completion of the single market and more liberal
policies (Economist, p. 11).
This is not how the Anglo-American press
normally speaks of Germany: a
triumphant Daily Mail has been
cheer-leading anti-German protests across Southern Europe; historian Dominic Sandbrook, writing in the same Mail, has been salivating over the prospects of a new world war
“sparked by Germany” (Sandbrook, 12 Mar. 2013); LSE Professor Ulrich Beck has been comparing Mrs Merkel with Machiavelli,
again, as publicised with barely contained satisfaction by the Mail (Sandbrook,
19 Apr. 2013) …
has been in the business of fuelling anti-German mass hysteria since the
early 1900s (Clarke, pp. 144 ff.; Ferguson,
2003, p. 292). Anti-German protests from Greece to Spain are easily
unmasked as mischief engineered by Chatham House, the Foreign Office, MI6
and their European collaborators. Nothing new there. More interesting are
LSE professors seeing a “Nazi Machiavelli” in Angela Merkel, of all.
The fact is that Mrs Merkel was born and
bred in Soviet-controlled East Germany and nothing in her profile suggests
that she distinguished herself as anything but an obedient and
well-assimilated citizen of the former Communist republic, let alone that
she might one day earn the Machiavelli title bestowed by slightly deranged,
left-wing LSE professors.
To get to the bottom of it, we must have a
look at the wider picture that is conveniently overlooked by the media and
their political bedfellows.
In the wake of the 1989 collapse of the
Communist Bloc, Rothschild interests and their associates, George Soros,
Goldman Sachs and others, were involved (as government advisers and
financiers) in the transfer of Eastern European industry from state control
to private ownership, in effect taking over much of those countries’
economy and finance in the process.
US banking giant Goldman Sachs (a left-wing
organisation which has been a key supporter of presidents Bill Clinton and
Barack Obama) started its German operations in 1990 to soon become the country’s
largest foreign investment bank as well as top government adviser.
Also in 1990, Angela Merkel, a scientist
turned politician, joined the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Germany’s
conservative party, of which she became leader in 2000, becoming Chancellor
of Germany in 2005.
During this time, Mrs Merkel also became a
close collaborator of Alexander Dibelius, the
powerful head of Goldman’s German, Austrian, Central and Eastern European
and Russian operations.
From 2005 to 2009, Mrs Merkel led a
coalition government consisting of her conservative CDU and the Social
Democratic Party (SPD) – a coalition as absurd (and obscene) as a
Labour-Tory one in Britain – and has gradually pushed the CDU so far left
that it has become barely recognisable as the “centre-right” party it was
just a couple of decades ago.
Mrs Merkel’s close relationship with
Goldman Sachs raises the question whether she is a Machiavelli or an
obedient collaborator of one of the world’s most powerful (and most
Machiavellian) banks (for Goldman’s Machiavellian credentials see W D Cohan, Money and
The answer is not difficult to guess.
According to German sources, Dibelius had made
contact with Merkel long before she became Chancellor and set her on her
current political course (Reischauer & Zdral,
The fact is that the direction German
politics has taken under Merkel’s leadership leads not to Hitlerism but to corporate Socialism controlled by global banks. Indeed,
it isn’t just Merkel; Germany’s economy and finance, too, have close ties
to Goldman. If Germany dominates Europe, it is itself dominated by global
banks. In other words, the real dominant element is not Merkel but
international financial interests.
This is confirmed by the fact that Dibelius, various other Goldman operatives and Merkel herself
are members of Atlantic-Brücke (Atlantic Bridge),
an organisation set up after the war by Rockefeller interests and their
German puppets to remote-control West Germany from across the Atlantic.
German-born Rockefeller lieutenant Henry Kissinger, a notorious left-wing
activist, is a leading member.
The media’s portrayal of Mrs Merkel as a
“new Hitler” is not only preposterous but can only serve to deflect attention
from the above fact. There can hardly be a better way of disguising a
Stalin in the making than by calling him (or her) a “Hitler.” This also
answers the question as to why the media are invariably baying for the
blood of some Germans (Kaiser Wilhelm, Hitler, Merkel)
but not others (the Rothschilds, the Oppenheimers, the Goldman Sachses) who between them control most of the world’s
As to those who wish for another world war,
they should remember what we got in the aftermath of the previous two: the League of Nations, the United
Nations, the European Union and other organisations working for world rule
by a financial clique. Above all, the once-great British nation found
itself ridden with debt and being replaced with immigrants as a reward.
it’s Saturday it’s the Germans again – or why the Mail has lost the plot
I. F., Voices Prophesying War
1763-1984, London, 1966.
William D., Money and Power: How Goldman
Sachs Came to Rule the World, London and New York, 2011.
Economist, “One woman to
rule them all,” 14 Sept. 2013.
Niall, Empire: How Britain made the modern world,
London, 2003, Penguin Books special edition London 2012.
Reischauer, Claudia and
Zdral, Wolfgang, “Goldman Sachs. Der Schattenmann,“ Capital, 12 Jul. 2006.
“Could Germany spark another war? I fear it’s all too possible,” Daily Mail, 12 Mar. 2013.
“Angela Merkel has made Germany master of Europe in a way Hitler and Kaiser
Wilhelm only dreamt of. The implications are frightening” Daily Mail, 19 Apr. 2013.